By Paul Edward Gottfried
In this trenchant problem to social engineering, Paul Gottfried analyzes a patricide: the slaying of nineteenth-century liberalism by way of the managerial country. many folks, in fact, discover that liberalism now not connotes disbursed powers and bourgeois ethical criteria, the necessity to shield civil society from an encroaching kingdom, or the virtues of energetic self-government. Many additionally understand that cutting-edge "liberals" have some distance varied objectives from these in their predecessors, aiming as they do principally to wrestle prejudice, to supply social companies and welfare advantages, and to guard expressive and "lifestyle" freedoms. Paul Gottfried does greater than learn those historic proof, despite the fact that. He builds on them to teach why it issues that the managerial country has changed conventional liberalism: the recent regimes of social engineers, he continues, are elitists, and their rule is consensual merely within the feel that it truly is unopposed by means of any common prepared opposition.
Throughout the western international, more and more uprooted populations unthinkingly settle for centralized controls in trade for a number of entitlements. of their scary passivity, Gottfried locates the situation for traditionalist and populist adversaries of the welfare country. How can rivals of administrative elites convey the general public that those that supply, in spite of the fact that ineptly, for his or her fabric wishes are the enemies of democratic self-rule and of self sustaining choice making in family members lifestyles? If we don't get up, Gottfried warns, the political debate might quickly be over, regardless of sporadic and ideologically burdened populist rumblings in either Europe and the United States.
Read Online or Download After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. PDF
Similar democracy books
Modern Pragmatism is an interdisciplinary, overseas magazine for discussions of making use of pragmatism, extensively understood, to contemporary concerns. CP will ponder articles approximately pragmatism written from the point of view of any culture and viewpoint. CP particularly seeks unique explorations and opinions of pragmatism, and in addition of pragmatism's family members with humanism, naturalism, and analytic philosophy.
The transition to democracy in Paraguay has been probably the most tough in Latin the US. This booklet highlights the constraints of the method of democratisation in a rustic which lacked a prior democratic culture and the place the legacy of the cruel regime of Alfredo Stroessner (1954-89) is enduring.
- The Myth Of Consumerism
- Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries
- Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process
- Reaganism and the Death of Representative Democracy
Extra info for After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State.
Our own liberal statements are no longer centered on the merits of distributed powers, the need to protect traditional civil society from an encroaching state, or bourgeois moral standards. Today’s liberal democracies express and accommodate other political concerns, from the need for entitlements to the combating of prejudice and the privileging by courts of lifestyle rights and designated minorities. In Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, governments have performed these tasks even more energetically than in the United States.
1 The efforts made by Dole and other Republicans to present themselves as fiscally responsible guardians of the welfare state had only limited success. 2 By the spring the president’s attacks on the opposition as the enemies of Medicare (for suggesting a need to raise premiums and to restrict some medical services) were finding their target. 4 More relevant, Medicare and entitlements in general became the salient electoral issue, and the increasingly vague appeal to “family values,” which had belonged to the Republican rhetorical arsenal in the past, now worked to Clinton’s advantage.
Moreover, welfare-state democracies succeed to the extent that they provide for material needs, and inasmuch as different groups with different material interests will be required by such governments to maintain minimal consensus, it follows that elected leaders will try to satisfy enough interest blocs to stay in their positions. ” This direction, it will be argued, is determined by the regime itself, both by its interest in destroying the remnants of an earlier civil society resistant to its power and by an evolving project of social reconstruction.